shane warne is a mummy's boy - he just didn't think when she told him to take slimming tablets. he just didn't seem to think that chasing other women while married was not a good idea. today's age mentions him:
roaring in anger... at the discovery that an amount of money he'd put in a sock seemed to have disappeared, only to find it in the other sock. Angry and bellowing about a stolen jumper, Warne was told the jumper was out on the ground where he had left it.
ok, perhaps he's not a mummy's boy - just an idiot. but this is the behaviour of a spoilt man. and men are spoiled by their mummies.
glenn the outback house overseer i suspect is a mummy's boy. insolent and childish, selfish and pathetic - he sulked and was so passive-agressive it was excruciating to watch. thank god the boss gave him the arse and he left. he was an absolute dickhead.
This from an article found online:
Comic Bernard Manning, who lived with his mother Nellie for 20 years, said men who stayed at home were making the right choice.
He said: "They are getting everything done for them - their shirts ironed, their beds made, meals on the table - and things a wife would never dream of doing, like ironing the cuffs and collars of your shirts.
"A wife would leave those, saying 'That's good enough'. With mothers, nothing is good enough for their sons."
leo di caprio - mummy's boy
colin farrell - yep, mummy's boy
kevin costner - complete mummy's boy
bill clinton - oh yeah
it's unconfirmed but i bet andrew landeryou IS and russell crowe too [see this http://www.burningblue.org/potpourri/ash/wbyh1.htm for an off-topic but freakout story]
but i bet johnny depp ISN'T
jury is out on matthew wales - maybe he was [hence the problems] and maybe he wasn't [hence the ability to top her just like that]
Maybe soon we'll be able to find out more as there is a call out for mummy's boys to take part in a new documentary. if anyone's interested perhaps get in touch, though i'm sure they've had no shortage of men applying. i'm sure lots of men would have no problem appearing on national television in a 6 part doco called mummy's boys, having been described as men who don't do very much for themselves and go running to mummy when things go wrong for them.
Extreme call for MUMMY'S BOYS
found at http://www.niftc.co.uk/newspage.asp?id=32&storyID=451
09 March 2005
Extreme Productions are looking for men between the ages of 25 - 45 to take part in a six part documentary series called MUMMY'S BOYS.
The criteria, broadly speaking still lives at home or is married/co-habiting/other but still runs home to mummy for advice, dinner whatever doesn't do very much for themselves can't or won't clean, cook etc.
We all know somebody!
We are also looking for their mummy's to take part.
If you know anyone who fits this profile, contact:
Michelle - Extreme Production LtdAssistant Producer Extreme Production1 Church ViewHolywoodBT18 9DP michelle@extremeproduction.com tel: 02890809050mobile: 07870208188
further reading:
anyone wanting to read more seriously on this topic, here is an interesting article online
http://www.achillesheel.freeuk.com/article12_3.html
harsh? tell me about it
just let me go and get some chocolate
Showing posts with label mummy boys. Show all posts
Showing posts with label mummy boys. Show all posts
Sunday, July 03, 2005
Saturday, July 02, 2005
mummy's boys
part one
mark latham is a self-confessed mummy’s boy.
Mum was my one true hero. If anyone ever called me a mummy's boy I'd wear it as a badge of honour because love of my mum and what she did for me is something that's been, y'know, up there as the most important thing in my life.
this is the answer here, for all you people wondering why mark had the massive dummy spit, went silent on the tsunami, quit politics [not just the leadership] and went the number one razor. he is a spoilt mummy'sboy who doesn't know how to keep his temper, control his reactions and think things through. now he has put whatever [little] credibility the ALP has remaining into the toilet with his new spit the dummy it's not fair book, and i for one, am almost glad he didn't get in. yes i voted for him. gave him a chance after voting greens for years. i thought perhaps there is a chance with this guy. at least he's trying and has a voice, unlike the eunuch beazley.
------------------------------------------------
i read in the paper that more than 80 percent of italian men aged between 18 and 30 still live with their parents. this has been named the “hotel mama” phenomenon.
hello?
i heard on the radio on thursday that there is a similar trend here, but it is divided fairly equally between the sexes. boys and girls are staying longer at home because they can’t afford to move out of home [so they say] or life is too good at home [now i think we’re getting warmer]
one caller said life is more liberal now and young people can bring their girl and boyfriends home and have sex with them. so in the past people had to move out so they could have regular, stress-free, non-car sex, whereas now they can have regular, really relaxed sex – with their parents in the next room watching the bill.
so basically kids can just stay at home, as long as they want, do what they want, and then maybe move out just as their parents become incontinent and infirm – they need to live their own lives you know. they don’t need to be tied down by having to look after the oldies.
one mother was laughing on the radio as she admitted she does her sons’ washing, irons their shirts, cooks for them, changes their linen once a week, and even makes their packed lunches every day [her reason was she doesn't want them in her kitchen. what an idiot]
do you clean his foreskin for him too lady?
one woman called in and said “how are these young people going to become independent?” i thought, here we go a voice of reason.
but she stopped right there
i wanted to call up and tell them that they were all missing the point.
what sorts of partners are these men going to make in their adult relationships? if they have grown up having a woman [mother/slave] doing everything for them, then how are they going to have an equal* relationship with a woman, and share responsibilities and burdens with her?
this is the stuff of my parents’ generation. live at home until you are married, then go straight from mummy’s apron strings to wifey’s.
what the hell is going on??
--------------------------------------------------
my question here is: who has benefitted most from these new arrangements? is it the woman who works a full-time week, runs around town ferrying children to dance/footy/drama/tennis/swimming class? hauling groceries, cooking, cleaning the house, looking after pets, keeping on top of the garden, keeping on top of her husband.
i think not.
i think it’s her husband/partner who has help now to pay off the mortgage, while he can still enjoy his sport and beer. how nice. the children aren’t better off [because they are in professional care]. the woman isn’t better off. [working a 40+ paid working week in addition to the unpaid whatever hours are left deal she has at home]
i don’t think so.
i need a wife. i know this has been said before, but my life would be so much easier if i didn’t have so much to do. then i might be able to write that novel, paint that picture, learn that language and take that dance class.
i know, wait until retirement. well, it’s a fuck of a long way off and i will be really, really tired by then.
* i don’t believe true equality is possible. feminism to date has just achieved a certain amount of freedoms [ie we can have sex without too much public censure, we can have abortions when we need them**, we can divorce without fault*** etc. BUT we can also work our fucking arses off in addition to doing most of the child rearing and domestic work, because on that front, ie child and home stuff, men simply are not doing that much more.]
** this may change if the current ugly and right-wing forces have their way
*** this has also benefitted men – they can now have affairs and abuse their women without being penalised through divorce/property/custody settlements
---------------------------------------------------
Coming – mummy's boys part two. Just to get you going, pick the mummy’s boys from this group:
adolf hitler, elvis, bill clinton, leo di caprio, matthew wales, eminem
Also, do you fear the greer – why germaine greer is so hated
mark latham is a self-confessed mummy’s boy.
Mum was my one true hero. If anyone ever called me a mummy's boy I'd wear it as a badge of honour because love of my mum and what she did for me is something that's been, y'know, up there as the most important thing in my life.
this is the answer here, for all you people wondering why mark had the massive dummy spit, went silent on the tsunami, quit politics [not just the leadership] and went the number one razor. he is a spoilt mummy'sboy who doesn't know how to keep his temper, control his reactions and think things through. now he has put whatever [little] credibility the ALP has remaining into the toilet with his new spit the dummy it's not fair book, and i for one, am almost glad he didn't get in. yes i voted for him. gave him a chance after voting greens for years. i thought perhaps there is a chance with this guy. at least he's trying and has a voice, unlike the eunuch beazley.
------------------------------------------------
i read in the paper that more than 80 percent of italian men aged between 18 and 30 still live with their parents. this has been named the “hotel mama” phenomenon.
hello?
i heard on the radio on thursday that there is a similar trend here, but it is divided fairly equally between the sexes. boys and girls are staying longer at home because they can’t afford to move out of home [so they say] or life is too good at home [now i think we’re getting warmer]
one caller said life is more liberal now and young people can bring their girl and boyfriends home and have sex with them. so in the past people had to move out so they could have regular, stress-free, non-car sex, whereas now they can have regular, really relaxed sex – with their parents in the next room watching the bill.
so basically kids can just stay at home, as long as they want, do what they want, and then maybe move out just as their parents become incontinent and infirm – they need to live their own lives you know. they don’t need to be tied down by having to look after the oldies.
one mother was laughing on the radio as she admitted she does her sons’ washing, irons their shirts, cooks for them, changes their linen once a week, and even makes their packed lunches every day [her reason was she doesn't want them in her kitchen. what an idiot]
do you clean his foreskin for him too lady?
one woman called in and said “how are these young people going to become independent?” i thought, here we go a voice of reason.
but she stopped right there
i wanted to call up and tell them that they were all missing the point.
what sorts of partners are these men going to make in their adult relationships? if they have grown up having a woman [mother/slave] doing everything for them, then how are they going to have an equal* relationship with a woman, and share responsibilities and burdens with her?
this is the stuff of my parents’ generation. live at home until you are married, then go straight from mummy’s apron strings to wifey’s.
what the hell is going on??
--------------------------------------------------
my question here is: who has benefitted most from these new arrangements? is it the woman who works a full-time week, runs around town ferrying children to dance/footy/drama/tennis/swimming class? hauling groceries, cooking, cleaning the house, looking after pets, keeping on top of the garden, keeping on top of her husband.
i think not.
i think it’s her husband/partner who has help now to pay off the mortgage, while he can still enjoy his sport and beer. how nice. the children aren’t better off [because they are in professional care]. the woman isn’t better off. [working a 40+ paid working week in addition to the unpaid whatever hours are left deal she has at home]
i don’t think so.
i need a wife. i know this has been said before, but my life would be so much easier if i didn’t have so much to do. then i might be able to write that novel, paint that picture, learn that language and take that dance class.
i know, wait until retirement. well, it’s a fuck of a long way off and i will be really, really tired by then.
* i don’t believe true equality is possible. feminism to date has just achieved a certain amount of freedoms [ie we can have sex without too much public censure, we can have abortions when we need them**, we can divorce without fault*** etc. BUT we can also work our fucking arses off in addition to doing most of the child rearing and domestic work, because on that front, ie child and home stuff, men simply are not doing that much more.]
** this may change if the current ugly and right-wing forces have their way
*** this has also benefitted men – they can now have affairs and abuse their women without being penalised through divorce/property/custody settlements
---------------------------------------------------
Coming – mummy's boys part two. Just to get you going, pick the mummy’s boys from this group:
adolf hitler, elvis, bill clinton, leo di caprio, matthew wales, eminem
Also, do you fear the greer – why germaine greer is so hated
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)